tyggerjai: (Default)
[personal profile] tyggerjai
So we're finally getting ADSL.
And I figure it's almost cheaper, given our setup, to get an ADSL router and retire the firewall box. The main requirement, of course, being less electricity :)

The router needs at least 2 ethernet ports (external network, internal network), and the ability to preferably to port filtering on both - I want $SMALLNUM ports available on the external network, and 0 ports on the internal - no external connections accepted at all, from either the real internet or the external network (since that's the point of an external/internal split...)

Any recommendations? The D-link DSL504 seems to fit the bill, though in the future we'll probably want wireless, so it might be worth grabbing a wireless one now if there's no significant quality tradeoff.

Or would a $100 ADSL card and a diskless LRP based firewall do a cheaper, better job?

sol.
.

Cards are bad ...

Date: 2004-03-24 05:19 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] subtle-eye.livejournal.com
For the same reason internal modems are bad.

Surges. (having lost a modem to a lightning strike)


Re: Cards are bad ...

Date: 2004-03-24 07:01 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] tyggerjai.livejournal.com
Ah.
Excellent point.
Well, people recommend the Draytek Vigor series, and TPG offer the 2500 for a cheapish price for new customers, so it looks like that's the go. 4 port goodness, so I can get more static IPs if one proves insufficient, or throw in a wireless network outside the firewall, or a dial-in box, or whatever. All good.

sol.
.

Profile

tyggerjai

Прекрасное Далеко

Слышу голос из Прекрасного Далека
Он зовет меня в прекрасные края
Слышу голос голос спрашивает строго
А сегодня что для завтра сделал я

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags